Zeolitin Farklı Tekstür Sınıfındaki Toprakların Fiziksel Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Year 2019, Volume: 50 Issue: 2, 174 - 186, 28.05.2019

Ekrem Lütfi Aksakal Yeliz Budak

https://doi.org/10.17097/ataunizfd.480777

Abstract

Toprağın
fiziksel özelliklerinin geliştirilmesi için pek çok organik ve inorganik toprak
düzenleyici kullanılmasına rağmen zeolitin toprak fiziksel özellikleri üzerine
etkilerini ortaya koyan araştırmalar çok sınırlıdır. Bu çalışma, kil (toprak
I), tın (toprak II) ve kumlu tın (toprak III) tekstür sınıfındaki toprakların
bazı fiziksel özellikleri üzerine zeolit (klinoptilolit) uygulamalarının
etkilerini ortaya koymak amacıyla laboratuvar şartlarında yürütülmüştür. Zeolit
uygulamaları ortalama ağırlıklı çap değerlerini toprak I’de 9.24 mm’den 5.06
mm’ye, toprak II’de 5.16 mm’den 4.14 mm’ye düşürürken, toprak III’de 2.61
mm’den 2.77 mm’ye yükseltmiştir. Zeolit uygulamaları araştırma topraklarının
tüm agregat fraksiyonlarında agregat stabilitesi değerlerini önemli seviyede artırırken,
dispersiyon oranını ise önemli seviyede düşürmüştür. Genel ortalama agregat
stabilitesi değeri kontrolde %26.64 iken zeolit uygulama dozunun artışı ile
artış göstermiş, %5 uygulama dozunda %43.51 olarak belirlenmiş ve kontrole göre
%63 oranında artışın meydana geldiği belirlenmiştir. Zeolit uygulamaları
topraklarının hacim ağırlıklarını önemli ölçüde düşürdüğü, porozite ve hidrolik
iletkenlik değerlerini ise önemli ölçüde artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Genel
ortalamada, kontrol seviyesinde hacim ağırlığı değeri 1.16 g cm^-3
iken %1, 3 ve 5 zeolit uygulamaları sonrasında 1.10, 1.08 ve 1.06 g cm^-3
olarak ölçülmüştür. Genel ortalamada, kontrol seviyesinde hidrolik iletkenlik
değeri 21.45 cm h^-1 iken %1, 3 ve 5 zeolit uygulamaları sonrasında
27.04, 30.51 ve 38.37 cm h^-1’e yükseldiği belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar,
toprağın fiziksel özelliklerinin iyileştirilmesi amacıyla zeolitin toprak
düzenleyici olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Zeolit, Agregat büyüklük dağılımı, Agregat stabilitesi, Dispersiyon oranı, Hacim ağırlığı, Hidrolik iletkenlik

Effects of Zeolite on Physical Properties of Different Textured Soils

Abstract

Despite the use of several organic and inorganic
soil conditioners for development of the physical properties of the soil, the
investigations on the effects of zeolite on soil physical properties are very
scarce. This laboratory study was carried out to determine the effects of
zeolite (clinoptilolite) with different rates on soil physical properties in
soils with different textures [clay (soil I), loam (soil II), sandy loam (soil
III)]. Mean weight diameter of soil I decreased from 9.24 mm to 5.06 mm with zeolite
application. These values were obtained as 5.16 mm to 4.14 mm and 2.61 mm to
2.77 mm for soils II and III, respectively. Zeolite applications significantly
increased aggregate stability of all the soils in all aggregate size fractions
as compared to the controls. Dispersion ratio of soils amended with zeolite
showed significant decreases. Whereas the aggregate stability of control was
26.64%, it increased to 43.51% with 5% zeolite application, which is almost 63%
greater than that of control. Zeolite applications on all three soils
significantly decreased bulk density and increased porosity and hydraulic
conductivity. When means were compared it is seen that the control bulk density
value (1.16 g cm^-3) decreased to 1.10, 1.08 and 1.06 g cm^-3
with 1%, 3 and 5 zeolite application, respectively. While the hydraulic
conductivity was determined as 21.45 cm h^-1 in control, it was
determined as 27.4, 30.51 and 38.37 cm h^-1 for 1%, 3 and 5 zeolite
application rates, respectively. Results have shown that zeolite can be used as
an amelioration material to improve soil physical properties.

Keywords

Zeolite, Aggregate size distribution, Aggregate stability, Dispersion ratio, Bulk density, Hydraulic conductivity

References

• Abdi, G.H., Khui, M.K., Eshghi, S., 2006. Effects on natural zeolite on growth and flowering on strawberry. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 1: 384-389.
• Aksakal, E.L., Sari, S., Angin, I., 2016. Effects of vermicompost application on soil aggregation and certain physical properties. Land Degrad. Develop., 27: 983-995.
• Allen E., Ming, D., Hossner, L., Henninger, D., Galindo, C., 1995, Growth and nutrient uptake of wheat in a clinoptilolite-phosphate rock substrate, Agronomy Journal, 87: 1052-1059.
• Angın, İ., 2008. Arıtma çamurlarının fiziksel ve kimyasal toprak düzenleyicisi olarak kullanımı. Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi, Erzurum.
• Bansiwal, A.K., Rayalu, S.S., Labhasetwar, N.K., Juwarkar, A.A., Devotta, S., 2006. Surfactant-modified zeolite as a slow release fertilizer for phosphorus. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54: 4773-4779.
• Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H., 1986a. Particle Density. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 377-382, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H., 1986b. Bulk Density. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 363-375, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. 2004. Mechanisms of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 23(6): 481-504.
• Candemir F, Gülser C. 2011. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42: 13-28.
• Chander, K., Joergensen, R.G., 2002. Decomposition of 14C labelled glucose in a Pb-contaminated soil remediated with synthetic zeolite and other amendments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34: 643-649.
• Chon, H., Woo, S.I., Park, S.E., 1996. Recent Advences and New Horizons in Zeolite Science and Techhnology. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
• Danielson, R.E., Sutherland, P.L., 1986. Porosity. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 443-461, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• DeSutter, T.M., Pierzynski, G.M., 2005. Evaluation of soils for use as liner materials: A soil chemistry approach. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34: 951-962.
• Dwyer, J., Dyer, A., 1984. Zeolites-An introduction. Chemistry and Industry, 2: 237-240.
• Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle-Size Analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 383-411, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Gülser, C., 2006. Effect of forage cropping treatments on soil structure and relationships with fractal dimensions. Geoderma, 131: 33-44.
• Hati, K.M., Biswas, A.K., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Misra, A.K., 2007. Soil properties and crop yields on a vertisol in India with application of distillery effluent. Soil and Tillage Research, 92: 60-68.
• Haynes, R.J., Naidu, R., 1998. Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 51: 123-137.
• Hurisso, T.T., Davis, J.G., Brummer, J.E., Stromberger, M.E., Mikha, M.M., Haddix, M.L., Booher, M.R., Paul, E.A., 2013. Rapid changes in microbial biomass and aggregate size distribution in response to changes in organic matter management in grass pasture. Geoderma, 193-194: 68-75.
• IBM, 2011. IBM Statistics for Windows, version 20.0. IBM Corporation. Armonk, NY.
• Kemper, W.D., Rosenau, R.C., 1986. Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 425-442, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Kırkık, E.B., 2011. Doğal Zeolit Uygulamasının Bazı Toprak Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
• Kithome, M., Paul, J.W., Lavkulich, L.M., Bomke, A.A., 1998. Kinetics of ammonium adsorption and desorption by the natural zeolite clinoptilolite. Soil Sciences Society of American Journal, 62: 622-629.Klute, A., Dirksen, C., 1986. Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 687-734, 1188 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Lal, R., 1988. Soil Erosion Research Methods. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Iowa-USA.
• Leggo, P.J., 2000, An investigation of plant growth in an organo-zeolitic substrate and its ecological significance. Plant and Soil, 219: 135-146.
• McLean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and Lime Requirement. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 199-224, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Moritani, S., Yamamoto, T., Andry, H., Inoue, M., Yuya, A., Kaneuchi, T., 2010. Effectiveness of artificial zeolite amendment in improving the physicochemical properties of saline-sodic soils characterised by different clay mineralogies. Australian J. of Soil Research, 48: 470-479.
• Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 539-579, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Nelson, R.E., 1982. Carbonate and Gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9. 181-197, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Opara, C.C., 2009. Soil microaggregates stability under different land use types in southeastern Nigeria. Catena, 79: 103–112.
• Razmi, Z., Sepaskhah, A.R., 2012. Effect of zeolite on saturated hydraulic conductivity and crack behavior of silty clay paddled soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58(7): 805-816.
• Rhoades, J.D., 1982a. Cation Exchange Capacity. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy No: 9, 149-157, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
• Rhoades, J.D., 1982b. Soluble Salts, In: Page, A.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ed.: ASA, SSSA, Agronomy No: 9. Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 167-179.
• Shirani, H., Hajabbasi, M.A., Afyuni, M., Hemmat, A., 2002. Effects of farmyard manure and tillage systems on soil physical properties and corn yield in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research, 68: 101-108.
• Susana, S., Roxana, V., Mignon, S., Vlad, S., Valentina, S., Bogdan, M., 2015. Using assessment of zeolite amendments in agriculture. ProEnvironment, 8: 85-88.
• Torma, S., Vilcek, J., Adamisin, P., Huttmanova, E., Hronec, O., 2014, Influence of natural zeolite on nitrogen dynamics in soil Turk Journal Agric For., 38: 739-744.
• Wang, S., Peng, Y., 2010. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 156: 11-24.
• Wehtje, G.R., Shaw, J.N., Walker, R.H., Williams, W., 2003. Bermudagrass growth in soil supplemented with inorganic amendments. Horticultural Science, 38(4): 613-617.
• Whalen, J.K., Chang, C., 2002. Macroaggregate characteristics in cultivated soils after 25 annual manure applications. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66: 1637-1647.