Optimization of Insulator Shape Using GA and HGAPSO Methods

Year 2014, , 145 - 149, 01.09.2014

M. R. Salimian H. Javadi

https://doi.org/10.17694/bajece.46424

Abstract

—The flashover voltage of insulator is relative to the distribution of the electric field. The distribution of the electric field on the insulator is contributed to the shape of insulator. For this, we must optimize the shape of insulator. In this paper, we use FEM, GA and HGAPSO for optimizing the shape of insulator. The tangential electric field and the area of insulator are optimized by GA and HGAPSO. Then, the results obtained from GA and HGAPSO are compared with each other

Keywords

-

References

• M. Abdel-Salam and E. K. Stanek, “Optimizing field stress of highvoltageinsulators,” IEEE Trans. Electr.Insul., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–56,Feb. 1987.
• M. Abdel-Salam and E. K. Stanek, “Field optimization of high- voltageinsulators,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. IA-22, no. 4, pp. 594– 601, Jul.1986.
• Z. Stih, “High voltage insulating system design by application of contour electrodeand Elect.Insul.,vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 579–584, Aug. 1986.
• optimization,” IEEE Trans.
• H. Singer, H. Steinbigler, and P. Weiss, “A charge simulation method for the calculation of high voltage fields,” IEEE Trans. Power App.Syst., vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 1660–1668, Feb. 1974.
• P. K. Mukherjee and C. K. Roy, “Computation of fields in and around insulators by fictitious point charges,” IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul., vol.EI-13, no. 1, pp. 24–31, Feb. 1978.
• N. H. Malik, “A review of the charge simulation method and its applications,” IEEE Trans. Elect. Insul., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Feb. 1989.
• H. El-Kishky and R. S. Gorur, “Electric potential and field computation along ac HV insulators,” IEEE Trans. Dielectr.Elect.Insul., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 982–990, Dec. 1994.
• V. Cingoski, K. Kaneda, H. Yamashita, and N. Kowata, “Inverse shape optimization using dynamically adjustable genetic algorithms,” IEEETrans. Energy Convers., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 661–666, Sep. 1999.
• R. Hinterding, H. Gieleski, and T. C. Peachey, “The nature of mutation in genetic algorithm,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, Jul.1995, pp. 65–72.
• W. Chen, H. Yang, and H. Huang, “Contour Optimization of Suspension Insulators Using Dynamically Adjustable Genetic Algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1220– 1228, Jul. 2010.
• O. W. Andersen, “Finite element solution of complex potential electric fields,” IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-96, no. 4, pp.1156– 1161, Jul./Aug. 1977.
• MATLAB PDE Toolbox User’s Guide, Version 7.6, 2008.