BibTex RIS Cite

YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ

Year 2016, Issue: 48, 254 - 271, 28.04.2016

Abstract

Bu çalışmada,
bedava binici sorunu ile yerel hisse tercihi etkileri temel alınarak; yerli ve
yabancı yatırımcı işlemleri arasındaki etkileşim incelenmektedir. Çalışmada
yerli ve yabancı yatırımcıların 28.11.2005-14.04.2015 tarihleri aralığında
günlük olarak sahip oldukları hisse sayıları veri olarak kullanılmıştır.
Veriler VAR modeli çözümlemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre;
BİST pay piyasasında hem yerel hisse tercihi hem de bedava binici sorunu
etkilerinin varlığı ortaya konulmuştur. Bulgulara göre, yerli ve yabancı
yatırımcılar birbirlerinden karşılıklı olarak pozitif yönde etkilenmektedirler.

References

  • Ahearne, A. G., Griever, W. L., & Warnock, F. E. (2004). Information costs and homebias: an analysis of US holdings of foreign equities. Journal of International Economics, 62 (2), 313-336.
  • Baele, L., Pungulescu, C., & Ter Horst, J. (2007). Model uncertainty, financial market integration and the home bias puzzle. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(4), 606-630.
  • Bozkurt, İ. (2015). Finansal Rasyoların Yabancı Yatırımcıların Hisse Seçimine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da Ampirik Bir Uygulama. Avrasya Ekonometri İstatistik ve Ampirik Ekonomi Dergisi, 2015(1), 65-79.
  • Britten‐Jones, M. (1999). The Sampling Error in Estimates of Mean‐Variance Efficient Portfolio Weights. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 655-671.
  • Campbell, R. A., & Kräussl, R. (2007). Revisiting the home bias puzzle: Downside equity risk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(7), 1239-1260.
  • Coval, J.D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999) Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Pref¬erence in Domestic Portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045–2073.
  • Diamond, D. W., (1984). Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, LI, 393-414.
  • French, K., & Poterba, J. (1991). Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets. American Economic Review, 81, 222-226.
  • Gehrig, T. (1993). An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97-109.
  • Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations By Econometric Models And Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2001). Temel Ekonometri. Ümit Şenesen ve Göktürk Şenesen (Çev.). İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kang, J.-K. & Stulz, R.M. (1997). Why is there a homebias? ananalysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 46(1): 3-28.
  • Kamesaka, A., Nofsinger, J. R. & Kawakita, H. (2003). Investment patterns and performance of investor groups in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(1), 1-22.
  • Kilka, M. & Weber, M. (2000). Home bias in international stock return expectations. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(3-4), 176-192.
  • Koop, G., Pesaran, M.H. & Potter, S.M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics, 74, 119–147.
  • Lewis, K. K. (1999). Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. Journal of economic literatür, 571-608.
  • Lütkepohl, H. (1993). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Maug, E. (1998). Large Share holders as Monitors: Is There a Tradeoff between Liquidity and Control?. Journal of Finance, Vol. LIII, No. 1, 65-98.
  • Sayın, K.O. (2014). Yabancı İşlemleri Eylül 2014. Gedik Yatırım Danışmanlığı ve Araştırma Merkezi. www.gedik.com, (19.02.2015).
  • Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58, 17–29.
  • Portes, R., & Rey, H. (2005). The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of international Economics, 65(2), 269-296.
  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomic sand Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
  • Sims, C.A. (l986). Are Forecasting Models Usable for Policy Analysis?. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, Vol 10.
  • Tesar, L.L. & Werner, L. M. (1995). Home Bias and High Turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14(4), 467-492.
  • Thomas, C. P.,Warnock, F. E. & Wongswan, J. (2004). The performance of international portfolios. FRB International Finance Discussion Paper (817).
  • Werner, I. M., & Tesar, L. L. (1997). The internationalization of securities markets since the 1987 crash (No. 97-55). Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Warnock, F. E. (2002). Home bias and high turnover reconsidered. Journal of International Money and Finance, 21(6), 795-805.
Year 2016, Issue: 48, 254 - 271, 28.04.2016

Abstract

References

  • Ahearne, A. G., Griever, W. L., & Warnock, F. E. (2004). Information costs and homebias: an analysis of US holdings of foreign equities. Journal of International Economics, 62 (2), 313-336.
  • Baele, L., Pungulescu, C., & Ter Horst, J. (2007). Model uncertainty, financial market integration and the home bias puzzle. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(4), 606-630.
  • Bozkurt, İ. (2015). Finansal Rasyoların Yabancı Yatırımcıların Hisse Seçimine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da Ampirik Bir Uygulama. Avrasya Ekonometri İstatistik ve Ampirik Ekonomi Dergisi, 2015(1), 65-79.
  • Britten‐Jones, M. (1999). The Sampling Error in Estimates of Mean‐Variance Efficient Portfolio Weights. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 655-671.
  • Campbell, R. A., & Kräussl, R. (2007). Revisiting the home bias puzzle: Downside equity risk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(7), 1239-1260.
  • Coval, J.D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999) Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Pref¬erence in Domestic Portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2045–2073.
  • Diamond, D. W., (1984). Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, LI, 393-414.
  • French, K., & Poterba, J. (1991). Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets. American Economic Review, 81, 222-226.
  • Gehrig, T. (1993). An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97-109.
  • Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations By Econometric Models And Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2001). Temel Ekonometri. Ümit Şenesen ve Göktürk Şenesen (Çev.). İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kang, J.-K. & Stulz, R.M. (1997). Why is there a homebias? ananalysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 46(1): 3-28.
  • Kamesaka, A., Nofsinger, J. R. & Kawakita, H. (2003). Investment patterns and performance of investor groups in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(1), 1-22.
  • Kilka, M. & Weber, M. (2000). Home bias in international stock return expectations. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(3-4), 176-192.
  • Koop, G., Pesaran, M.H. & Potter, S.M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics, 74, 119–147.
  • Lewis, K. K. (1999). Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. Journal of economic literatür, 571-608.
  • Lütkepohl, H. (1993). Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Maug, E. (1998). Large Share holders as Monitors: Is There a Tradeoff between Liquidity and Control?. Journal of Finance, Vol. LIII, No. 1, 65-98.
  • Sayın, K.O. (2014). Yabancı İşlemleri Eylül 2014. Gedik Yatırım Danışmanlığı ve Araştırma Merkezi. www.gedik.com, (19.02.2015).
  • Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58, 17–29.
  • Portes, R., & Rey, H. (2005). The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of international Economics, 65(2), 269-296.
  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomic sand Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
  • Sims, C.A. (l986). Are Forecasting Models Usable for Policy Analysis?. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, Vol 10.
  • Tesar, L.L. & Werner, L. M. (1995). Home Bias and High Turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14(4), 467-492.
  • Thomas, C. P.,Warnock, F. E. & Wongswan, J. (2004). The performance of international portfolios. FRB International Finance Discussion Paper (817).
  • Werner, I. M., & Tesar, L. L. (1997). The internationalization of securities markets since the 1987 crash (No. 97-55). Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Warnock, F. E. (2002). Home bias and high turnover reconsidered. Journal of International Money and Finance, 21(6), 795-805.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

İbrahim Bozkurt

Publication Date April 28, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Issue: 48

Cite

APA Bozkurt, İ. (2016). YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(48), 254-271.
AMA Bozkurt İ. YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. April 2016;(48):254-271.
Chicago Bozkurt, İbrahim. “YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ Ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 48 (April 2016): 254-71.
EndNote Bozkurt İ (April 1, 2016) YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 48 254–271.
IEEE İ. Bozkurt, “YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 48, pp. 254–271, April 2016.
ISNAD Bozkurt, İbrahim. “YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ Ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 48 (April 2016), 254-271.
JAMA Bozkurt İ. YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016;:254–271.
MLA Bozkurt, İbrahim. “YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ Ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 48, 2016, pp. 254-71.
Vancouver Bozkurt İ. YEREL HİSSE TERCİHİ ve BEDAVA BİNİCİ SORUNU ETKİSİ TEMELİNDE YERLİ VE YABANCI YATIRIMCI ETKİLEŞİMİNİN TESPİTİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016(48):254-71.

Dergimiz EBSCOhost, ULAKBİM/Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanında, SOBİAD ve Türk Eğitim İndeksi'nde yer alan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir.