A Systematic Review of Cognitive Ergonomics And Safety: General Trends And Application Areas

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 1131 - 1161, 28.12.2023

Uğur Atıcı Aylin Adem Mehmet Burak Şenol Metin Dağdeviren

https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.1378288

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to reveal the studies on Cognitive Ergonomics (CE), determine general trends, show the gaps and extract new knowledge from the body of the literature. Ergonomics evolved from classical to physical and CE. The literature review on CE is quite limited. Thus, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the CE literature between 1974-2021 to provide an original perspective and extend what is known through analysis, modeling and introduction of new theories. 1958 papers identified from Electronic Databases, 254 of them were selected and included in the analysis. The PRISMA technique was used for the systematic reviews of CE literature with the statistical evidences and detailed discussions. As a result, CE studies were classified into 4 main groups with 13 subgroups. This study offers, constructive analyses of scientific publications on CE, by combing the literature and summarizing the current knowledge in a cogent way.Thus, a basis to enhance future applications in CE was provided. It is predicted that CE activities will be used to solve cognitive problems in more and more areas in the rapidly digitalizing world and will take their place soon especially in Metaverse application and softwares.

Keywords

cognitive ergonomics, Literature review, Mental workload, Neuro-ergonomics

References

• [1] Cañas J., Cognitive Ergonomics in Interface Development Evaluation. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(16) (2008) 2630-2649.
• [2] Andrew Life M., Barber J. Edworthy, Back to the future Cognitive Ergonomics six years on. Ergonomics, 39(3) (1996) 341-344.
• [3] Moher D., et al., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4) (2009) 264-269.
• [4] Adem A., Dağdeviren M., A personnel scheduling model containing thermal comfort and equivalent metabolic rate factors. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 36(1) (2021) 303-317.
• [5] Adem A., Dağdeviren M., A job rotation‐scheduling model for blue‐collar employees' hand–arm vibration levels in manufacturing firms. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 31(2) (2021) 174-190.
• [6] Veer G.C et al., Cognitive Ergonomics in Interface Design - Discussion of a Moving Science. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(16) (2008) 2614-2629.
• [7] Decortis F., Noirfalise S., Saudelli B., Activity theory, cognitive ergonomics and distributed cognition three views of a transport company. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(1) (2000) 5-33.
• [8] Mehta R.K., Integrating Physical and Cognitive Ergonomics. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2-3) (2016) 83-87.
• [9] Murray D.M., et al., Rethinking Cognitive Ergonomics, in Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Association for Computing Machinery BELFAST, United Kingdom, (2019) 36–37.
• [10] Pankok C., et al., The Effect of Physical Workload and Modality of Information Presentation on Cognitive Inhibition in Highly Fit Young Males. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2-3) (2016). 88-103.
• [11] Morton J., The bankruptcy of everyday thinking. American Psychologist, 46(1991). 32-33.
• [12] Crandall B., Klein G., Hoffman R.R., Working minds A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis. Working minds, A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis., Cambridge, MA, US MIT Press. (2006) 332
• [13] Lavie N., Distracted and Confused? Selective Attention Under Load. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9 (2005) 75-82.
• [14] Pearson D.G. and Sahraie A., Oculomotor control and the maintenance of spatially and temporally distributed events in visuo-spatial working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 56A (7) (2003) 1089-1111.
• [15] Venetjoki N., et al., The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49(11) (2006) 1068-1091.
• [16] Cowan N., The magical number 4 in short-term memory a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci, 24(1) (2001). 87-114.
• [17] Spence C., Crossmodal attention. Scholarpedia, (2010) 5 6309.
• [18] Dunlosky J., et al., Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1) (2013) 4-58.
• [19] Tversky A. Kahneman D., Judgment under Uncertainty Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185 (4157) (1974) 1124-1131.
• [20] Cañas J., et al., Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46(5) (2003) 482-501.
• [21] Ericsson K.A. Lehmann A.C., Expert and Exceptional Performance Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1) (1996) 273-305.
• [22] Sluiter J.K., High-demand jobs age-related diversity in work ability? Applied Ergononomics, 37(4) (2006) 429-40.
• [23] Endsley M.R., Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors, 37(1) 1995 32-64.
• [24] Kalakoski V., et al., Effects of a cognitive ergonomics workplace intervention (CogErg) on cognitive strain and well-being a cluster-randomized controlled trial. A study protocol. BMC Psychology, 8(1) (2020) 1.
• [25] Biyikli O. Aydogan E.K., Neuroergonomics and Basic Applications. Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 3(3) (2015) 173-179.
• [26] Long J., Cognitive Ergonomics and Human-Computer Interaction, ed. C. J. Long and A. Whitefield. 1989, Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
• [27] JØRgensen A.H., Thinking-aloud in user interface design a method promoting cognitive ergonomics. Ergonomics, (1990) 33(4) 501-507.
• [28] Lawler E.K., Hedge A., Pavlovic-Veselinovic S., Cognitive ergonomics, socio-technical systems, and the impact of healthcare information technologies. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(4) (2011) 336-344.
• [29] Hanne T. Trinkaus H.L., Know Cube for MCDM – Visual and Interactive Support for Multicriteria Decision Making. (2003).
• [30] Mohanty, et al., A novel multi-attribute decision making approach for selection of appropriate product conforming ergonomic considerations. Operations Research Perspectives, 5 (2018) 82-93.
• [31] Benmoussa K., et al., AHP-based Approach for Evaluating Ergonomic Criteria. Procedia Manufacturing, 32 (2019) 856-863.
• [32] Vicente K.J., Mumaw R.J., and Roth E.M., Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment a qualitative cognitive model based on field observations. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(5) (2004) 359-384.
• [33] Détienne F., Burkhardt J.-M., Visser W., Cognitive Effort in Collective Software Design Methodological Perspectives in Cognitive Ergonomics, in Dans 2nd Workshop on Empirical Software Engineering, M.C. Catone, Editor. (2003) Italy.
• [34] McCarthy J., Wright P., Cooke M., From information processing to dialogical meaning making an experiential approach to cognitive ergonomics. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6(2) (2004) 107-116.
• [35] Hollnagel E., Extended cognition and the future of ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(3) (2001) 309-315.
• [36] De Keyser V., Can we build a cognitive ergonomics? Le Travail Humain, 54(4) (1991). 345-350.
• [37] Eason K.D., Ergonomic perspectives on advances in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics, 34(6) (1991) 721-741.
• [38] Venda V.F., Trybus R.J., Venda N.I., Cognitive Ergonomics Theory, Laws, and Graphic Models. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(4) (2000) 331-349.
• [39] Blomé M., Johansson C.R., Odenrick P., Visualization of ergonomic guidelines — A comparison of two computer aided systems to support vehicle design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(6) (2006) 571-580.
• [40] Bisantz A. Roth E., Analysis of cognitive work. Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, 3(1) (2007) 1-43.
• [41] Bisantz A.M. Burns C.M., Applications of cognitive work analysis. (2008) CRC Press.
• [42] Eraslan E. Dağdeviren M., A Cognitive Approach for Performance Measurement in Flexible Manufacturing Systems using Cognitive Maps, in Cognitive Maps, K. Perusich, Editor. (2010), IntechOpen.
• [43] Blakely M.J., Kemp S., Helton W.S, Volitional Running and Tone Counting The Impact of Cognitive Load on Running Over Natural Terrain. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2-3) (2016) 104-114.
• [44] Cullen R.H. Agnew M.J., Comparing Different Measures of Overall Workload in a Multimodal Postural/Auditory Dual-Task Environment. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2-3) (2016) 115-127.
• [45] Ye, T., Pan X, Fatigue, Cognitive Performance, and Subjective Recovery Time Estimation in High-Intensity Work. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4(2-3) (2016). 141-150.
• [46] Liu Y., Wickens, Mental workload and cognitive task automaticity an evaluation of subjective and time estimation C.D. metrics. Ergonomics, 37(11) (1994) 1843-1854.
• [47] Roth E.M., Woods D.D., Pople H.E., Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis. Ergonomics, 35(10) (1992) 1163-1198.
• [48] Darses F., Providing practitioners with techniques for cognitive work analysis. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(3) (2001) 268-277.
• [49] D. St-Maurice, J., Burns C. M., Using cognitive work analysis to compare complex system domains. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(5) (2018) 553-577.
• [50] Hoc J.M. Amalberti R., Cognitive Control Dynamics for Reaching a Satisficing Performance in Complex Dynamic Situations. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1(1) (2007). 22-55.
• [51] Bodin I. Krupenia S.S., Activity Prioritization to Focus the Control Task Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 10(1) (2016) 91-104.
• [52] Goh S.K. Coury B.G., Incorporating the effect of display formats in cognitive modelling. Ergonomics, 37(4) (1994) 725-745.
• [53] Long J., Cognitive Ergonomics – Past, Present, Future 10 Lessons Learned (10 Lessons Remaining). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(6) (2000). 557-560.
• [54] Yoon W.C., Cognitive Ergonomics in New Territories. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, (2000) 44(6) 564-567.
• [55] Rosenhand H., Roth E., Multer J., Cognitive and Collaborative Demands of Freight Conductor Activities Results and Implications of a Cognitive Task Analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1) (2011) 1884-1888.
• [56] Naikar N., Moylan A., Pearce B., Analysing activity in complex systems with cognitive work analysis concepts, guidelines and case study for control task analysis. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(4) (2006) 371-394.
• [57] Bisantz A.M., et al., Integrating cognitive analyses in a large-scale system design process. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(2) (2003). 177-206.
• [58] Elm W.C., et al., Applied cognitive work analysis A pragmatic methodology for designing revolutionary cognitive affordances. Handbook of cognitive task design, (2003) 357-382.
• [59] Cornelissen M., et al., Assessing the ‘system’ in safe systems-based road designs Using cognitive work analysis to evaluate intersection designs. Accident Analysis & Prevention, (2015). 74 324-338.
• [60] Read G.J.M., Salmon M.,. Lenné M.G, From work analysis to work design A review of cognitive work analysis design applications. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1) (2012) 368-372.
• [61] Stevens N., Salmon P., Safe places for pedestrians Using cognitive work analysis to consider the relationships between the engineering and urban design of footpaths. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72 (2014) 257-266.
• [62] Roth E.M., Uncovering the Requirements of Cognitive Work. Human Factors, 50(3) (2008). 475-480.
• [63] Militello L.G., et al., The role of cognitive systems engineering in the systems engineering design process. Systems Engineering, 13(3) (2010) 261-273.
• [64] Li Y. Burns C.M., Modeling Automation with Cognitive Work Analysis to Support Human-Automation Coordination. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 11(4) (2017) 299-322.
• [65] Read G.J.M., et al., Designing a ticket to ride with the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit. Ergonomics, 58(8) (2015) 1266-1286.
• [66] Wei J. Salvendy G., Development of a human information processing model for cognitive task analysis and design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(4) (2006) 345-370.
• [67] Confer S.M. Batra S., Cognitive Ergonomics for Websites from Concept to Realization. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(4) (2000) 429-432.
• [68] Vicente K.J., Task Analysis, Cognitive Task Analysis, Cognitive Work Analysis What's the Difference? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 39(9) (1995) 534-537.
• [69] Aghajani H., Garbey M., and Omurtag A., Measuring mental workload with EEG+ fNIRS. Frontiers in human neuroscience, (2017) 11 359.
• [70] Albayram Y., et al. The Effects of Risk and Role on Users’ Anticipated Emotions in Safety-Critical Systems. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [71] Bagnara S., Marti P., Human work in call centres A challenge for cognitive ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(3) (2001) 223-237.
• [72] Berka C., et al., EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine,. 78(5) (2007) B231-B244.
• [73] Bhatt R., Ojha A., Indurkhya B., Interpretation of Metaphors with Perceptual Features Using WordNet. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2011). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [74] Bosse T., Schnitfink K., The Effect of Simulated Threat on Task Performance During Emotion Recognition. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2015). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [75] Cavallo D., et al., An analytical framework for assessing cognitive capacity and processing speed of operators in industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 180 (2021) 318-327.
• [76] Chen J.-G., Jung H.S., Peacock B.J., A fuzzy sets modelling approach for ergonomic workload stress analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 13(3) (1994) 189-216.
• [77] Du X., et al. How Automation Effect Mental Workload of Novice Operators in Space Rendezvous and Docking. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2015). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [78] Durugbo C.M., Eye tracking for work-related visual search a cognitive task analysis. Ergonomics, 64(2) (2021) 225-240.
• [79] Feltman K.A., Bernhardt K.A., Kelley A.M., Measuring the domain specificity of workload using EEG Auditory and visual domains in Rotary-Wing simulated flight. Human Factors, 63(7) (2021)1271-1283.
• [80] Flad N., et al. System Delay in Flight Simulators Impairs Performance and Increases Physiological Workload. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [81] Gray W.D., Schoelles M.J., Sims C., Cognitive Metrics Profiling. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(12) (2005) 1144-1148.
• [82] Green T.R.G. Hoc J.M., What is cognitive ergonomics? Le Travail Humain, 54(4) (1991) 291-304.
• [83] Herff C., et al., Mental workload during n-back task—quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Frontiers in human neuroscience, (2014) 7 935.
• [84] Iqbal B.M., Suzianti A., Nurtjahyo B.. Military Vehicle Dashboard Design Using Semantics Method in Cognitive Ergonomics Framework. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2015). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [85] Jenkins D., et al. The Development of a Cognitive Work Analysis Tool. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [86] Jenkins D., et al., Using cognitive work analysis to explore activity allocation within military domains. Ergonomics, 51(6) (2008) 798-815.
• [87] Jin X., et al. A Method to Estimate Operator’s Mental Workload in Multiple Information Presentation Environment of Agricultural Vehicles. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Performance, Emotion and Situation Awareness. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [88] Kaber D.B. Kim S.-H., Understanding Cognitive Strategy with Adaptive Automation in Dual-Task Performance Using Computational Cognitive Models. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 5(3) (2011) 309-331.
• [89] Kretschmer V., et al. Smart Palletisation Cognitive Ergonomics in Augmented Reality Based Palletising. in Intelligent Human Systems Integration. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [90] Lagomarsino M., et al., An Online Framework for Cognitive Load Assessment in Industrial Tasks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 78, (2022) 102380.
• [91] Li W.-C., et al. The Evaluation of Pilot’s First Fixation and Response Time to Different Design of Alerting Messages. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Performance, Emotion and Situation Awareness. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [92] Liang S.-F.M. Chen C.-W., Modeling Situation Awareness on Alarm Displays in Nuclear Power Plants. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2015). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [93] Liston M., McDonald N., System Requirements for an Advanced Cockpit to Reduce Workload and Stress. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [94] Liu S., Wadeson A., Nam C.S.. Toward Quantitative Modeling of User Performance in Multitasking Environments. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [95] Liu W., et al. An Analysis of Pilot’s Workload Evaluation Based on Time Pressure and Effort. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Performance, Emotion and Situation Awareness. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [96] Mehta R.K. Parasuraman R., Effects of mental fatigue on the development of physical fatigue a neuroergonomic approach. Human factors, 56(4) (2014) 645-656.
• [97] Neerincx M.A., et al. Automatic Feedback on Cognitive Load and Emotional State of Traffic Controllers. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [98] Parlangeli O., Caratozzolo M.C., and Guidi S., Multitasking and Mentalizing Machines How the Workload Can Have Influence on the System Comprehension. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [99] Pfeffer S., et al. Estimation of Operator Input and Output Workload in Complex Human-Machine-Systems for Usability Issues with iFlow. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition. (2013). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [100] Putri M., Yang X., Kim J.H,. Sensitivity, Bias, and Mental Workload in a Multitasking Environment. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [101] Qiu, J. Han T., Integrated Model for Workload Assessment Based on Multiple Physiological Parameters Measurement. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [102] Radüntz T., A New Method for Mental Workload Registration. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [103] Radüntz T., Neuronal Mental Workload Registration during Execution of Cognitive Tasks. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [104] Ruf C., Stütz P., Model-Driven Payload Sensor Operation Assistance for a Transport Helicopter Crew in Manned–Unmanned Teaming Missions Assistance Realization, Modelling Experimental Evaluation of Mental Workload. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Performance, Emotion and Situation Awareness. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [105] Salmon P., et al., Hierarchical task analysis vs. cognitive work analysis comparison of theory, methodology and contribution to system design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(6) (2010) 504-531.
• [106] Sarter N., Sarter M., Neuroergonomics Opportunities and challenges of merging cognitive neuroscience with cognitive ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4(1-2) (2003) 142-150.
• [107] Sassaroli A., et al., Discrimination of mental workload levels in human subjects with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences, 1(02) (2008) 227-237.
• [108] Stevens N.J. Salmon M., New Knowledge for Built Environments Exploring Urban Design from Socio-technical System Perspectives. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2015). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [109] Sumner T., N. Bonnardel, Kallak B.H., The cognitive ergonomics of knowledge-based design support systems, in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems., Association for Computing Machinery Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 199783–90.
• [110] Truschzinski M., Valtin G., Müller N.H., Investigating the Influence of Emotion in Air Traffic Controller Tasks Pretest Evaluation. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Performance, Emotion and Situation Awareness. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [111] Wei Z., et al. A Theoretical Model of Mental Workload in Pilots Based on Multiple Experimental Measurements. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [112] Wu H.-C., Lee C.-L., Lin C.-T., Ergonomic evaluation of three popular Chinese e-book displays for prolonged reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, (2007) 37(9) 761-770.
• [113] Zhang X., et al. Can Fixation Frequency Be Used to Assess Pilots’ Mental Workload During Taxiing? in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Performance, Emotion and Situation Awareness. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [114] Alyan E., et al., Workplace design-related stress effects on prefrontal cortex connectivity and neurovascular coupling. Applied Ergonomics, 96 (2021) 103497.
• [115] Czerniak J.N., Brandl C., Mertens A., Designing human-machine interaction concepts for machine tool controls regarding ergonomic requirements. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1) (2017) 1378-1383.
• [116] Faber M., Bützler J., Schlick C.M., Human-robot Cooperation in Future Production Systems Analysis of Requirements for Designing an Ergonomic Work System. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(2015) 510-517.
• [117] Hartono B., Saputra B.A., Are the Experts Really Experts? a Cognitive Ergonomics Investigation for Project Estimations. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 14(2) (2012) 115-122
• [118] Hollnagel E., Cognitive ergonomics and the reliability of cognition. Le Travail Humain, 54(4) (1991) 305-321.
• [119] Jenkins D., et al., Cognitive work analysis coping with complexity. (2017) CRC Press.
• [120] Kim J.H., The Impact of Metacognitive Monitoring Feedback on Mental Workload and Situational Awareness. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [121] Read G.J.M., et al., Using cognitive work analysis to identify competencies for human factors and ergonomics practitioners. Ergonomics, 65(3) (2022) 348-361.
• [122] Schulte A., et al. A Heterarchical Urgency-Based Design Pattern for Human Automation Interaction. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [123] Song B., et al. A Multidimensional Workload Assessment Method for Power Grid Dispatcher. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [124] Sun R., et al. Task-Load Evaluation Method for Maintenance Personnel Based on the JACK Simulation. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [125] Teng X., et al. The Identification of Human Errors in the Power Dispatching Based on the TRACEr Method. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [126] Wang Q., et al. Ergonomic Evaluation Study of Occupant Function Allocation for Riot Vehicle Based on Task Load. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [127] Zheng B., et al. Effect of Different Information Push Mechanism on Driver’s Situation Awareness. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [128] Abe K., et al. Automatic Classification of Eye Blink Types Using a Frame-Splitting Method. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition. (2013). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [129] Ericson K.A.E., Lehmann A.C., Expert and Exceptional Performance Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1) (1996) 273-305.
• [130] Borghetti B.J., Giametta J.J., Rusnock C.F., Assessing continuous operator workload with a hybrid scaffolded neuroergonomic modeling approach. Human factors, 59(1) (2017) 134-146.
• [131] Dzaack J. Urbas L., Cognitive Model Data Analysis for the Evaluation of Human Computer Interaction. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [132] Feng J., Spence I., Effects of Cognitive Training on Individual Differences in Attention. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [133] Ferrari V., et al. Psycho-Physiological Evaluation of the Pilot A Study Conducted with Pilots of the French Air Force. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [134] Hong S.-K. Ryu S., Human Performance Model for Combined Steering-Targeting Tasks. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [135] Kang, S.H., J. Lee, and S. Jin, Effect of standing desk use on cognitive performance and physical workload while engaged with high cognitive demand tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 92 (2021). 103306.
• [136] Kreutzfeldt M., Renker, J., Rinkenauer G., The Attentional Perspective on Smart Devices Empirical Evidence for Device-Specific Cognitive Ergonomics. in Advances in Ergonomics in Design. (2019). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [137] Lind M., Sundvall H., Time Estimation as a Measure of Mental Workload. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [138] Miyake S., et al. Multidimensional Evaluation of Human Responses to the Workload. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [139] Tajri I., Cherkaoui A., Benchekroun T.H., The impact of TLE on employees' stress and performance and role of cognitive ergonomics in reducing lean's stressors. in Proceedings of (2013) International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM). (2013).
• [140] Volz K.M., Dorneich M.C., Evaluation of Cognitive Skill Degradation in Flight Planning. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 14(4) (2020) 263-287.
• [141] Wang C., et al. Modeling and Simulating Astronaut’s Performance in a Three-Level Architecture. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [142] Alfredson J., et al. Applied Cognitive Ergonomics Design Principles for Fighter Aircraft. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2011). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [143] Bridger R.S., et al., Job strain related to cognitive failure in naval personnel. Ergonomics, 53(6) (2010) 739-747.
• [144] Gempton N., et al. Autonomous Control in Military Logistics Vehicles Trust and Safety Analysis. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Applications and Services. (2013). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [145] Horn A., Li W.-C., Braithwaite G., Human-Centered Design of Flight Mode Annunciation for Instantaneous Mode Awareness. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [146] Li Y., et al. Inter-sector Backup Behaviors in Parallel Approach ATC The Effect of Job Satisfaction. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [147] Stanton N.A. McIlroy R.C., Designing mission communication planning the role of Rich Pictures and Cognitive Work Analysis. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 13(2) (2012) 146-168.
• [148] Causse M., Peysakhovich V., Fabre E.F., High working memory load impairs language processing during a simulated piloting task an ERP and pupillometry study. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10 (2016) 240.
• [149] Correia W., et al., The methodological involvement of the emotional design and cognitive ergonomics as a tool in the development of children products. Work, 41(2012) 1066-1071.
• [150] Dong X. Hayes C.C., Using Uncertainty to Inform Information Sufficiency in Decision Making. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2011). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [151] Karwowski W., Cognitive Ergonomics; Requisite Compatibility, Fuzziness and Nonlinear Dynamics. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, (2000) 44(6) 580-583.
• [152] Kim J.H., et al. Developing Metacognitive Models for Team-Based Dynamic Environment Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition. (2013). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [153] Oyekan J., et al., Applying a fusion of wearable sensors and a cognitive inspired architecture to real-time ergonomics analysis of manual assembly tasks. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61(2021) 391-405.
• [154] Peter T., et al., Information presentation in manual assembly a cognitive ergonomics analysis. (2017).
• [155] Zolotová I., et al., Smart and cognitive solutions for Operator 4.0 Laboratory H-CPPS case studies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139 (2020) 105471.
• [156] Adriaensen A, et al., A socio-technical analysis of functional properties in a joint cognitive system a case study in an aircraft cockpit. Ergonomics, 62(12) (2019) 1598-1616.
• [157] Crawford, E.G., Toft Y., Kift R.L., Attending to Technology Adoption in Railway Control Rooms to Increase Functional Resilience. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [158] Di Flumeri, G., et al., EEG-based mental workload neurometric to evaluate the impact of different traffic and road conditions in real driving settings. Frontiers in human neuroscience, (2018) 509.
• [159] Diederichs J.F., et al. New HMI Concept for Motorcycles–The Saferider Approach. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2009). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [160] Dunbar J. Gilbert J.E., The Human Element in Autonomous Vehicles. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Cognition and Design. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [161] Foy H.J., Runham P., Chapman P., Prefrontal cortex activation and young driver behaviour a fNIRS study. PLoS one, 11(5) (2016). e0156512.
• [162] Hachisuka S., et al. Facial Expression Measurement for Detecting Driver Drowsiness. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2011). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [163] Labiale G., Cognitive Ergonomics and Intelligent Systems in the Automobile, in Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces, Y.I. Noy, Editor. 1997, CRC Press.
• [164] Liu Y., et al. EEG-based Mental Workload and Stress Recognition of Crew Members in Maritime Virtual Simulator A Case Study. in CW. (2017).
• [165] Masuda T., et al. The Influence of False and Missing Alarms of Safety System on Drivers’ Risk-Taking Behavior. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2011). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [166] Rahman F., Amin B., Parvez M., Application of AHP in Development of Multi-Criteria Ergonomic Approach for Choosing the Optimal Alternative for Material Handling- A Case Study and Software Development to Facilitate AHP Calculation. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (2014) 3(6).
• [167] Walker, G.H., Stanton N.A., Young M.S., An On-Road Investigation of Vehicle Feedback and Its Role in Driver Cognition Implications for Cognitive Ergonomics. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5(4) (2001) 421-444.
• [168] Zheng Y., Zhao G., Natural Interaction in Video Image Investigation and Its Evaluation. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [169] Di Stasi L.L., et al., Task complexity modulates pilot electroencephalographic activity during real flights. Psychophysiology, 52(7) (2015) 951-956.
• [170] Kistan T., Gardi A., Sabatini R., Machine Learning and Cognitive Ergonomics in Air Traffic Management Recent Developments and Considerations for Certification. Aerospace, 5(4) (2018) 103.
• [171] Li W.-C., et al. The Evaluation of Pilot’s Situational Awareness During Mode Changes on Flight Mode Annunciators. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [172] Lintern G., The Airspace as a Cognitive System. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21(1) (2011) 3-15.
• [173] McDonald N., et al. Proactive Safety Performance for Aviation Operations. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [174] Wang L., et al. A Novel Approach for Comprehensive Evaluation of Flight Deck Ergonomic Design Delphi-Order Relation Analysis (ORA) Method and Improved Radar Chart. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [175] Wu X., et al. How Shared Screen Affected Team Collaboration Task, A Case Study of Ergonomics Experiment on Team Situation Awareness. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [176] Wu X., et al. Pilot Situational Awareness Modeling for Cockpit Interface Evaluation. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [177] Burns C.M., Enomoto Y., Momtahan K., A cognitive work analysis of cardiac care nurses performing teletriage, in Applications of cognitive work analysis. (2016), CRC Press. 163-188.
• [178] Despont-Gros C., et al., Acceptance and cognitive load in a clinical setting of a novel device allowing natural real-time data acquisition. International Journal of Medical Informatics). 76(11) (2007) 850-855.
• [179] Effken J.A., et al., Using Cognitive Work Analysis to fit decision support tools to nurse managers’ work flow. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(10) (2011). 698-707.
• [180] Lee G.I., et al., Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surgical Endoscopy, 28(2) (2014) 456-465.
• [181] Lopez K.D., et al., Cognitive work analysis to evaluate the problem of patient falls in an inpatient setting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(3) (2010) 313-321.
• [182] Webster C.S. Weller J.M., Data visualisation and cognitive ergonomics in anaesthesia and healthcare. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 126(5) (2021) 913-915.
• [183] Wung S.-F. M.R. Schatz, Critical Care Nurses' Cognitive Ergonomics Related to Medical Device Alarms. Critical care nursing clinics of North America, 30(2) (2018). 191-202.
• [184] Brown T., Moeckli J., Marshall D., Use of High-Fidelity Simulation to Evaluate Driver Performance with Vehicle Automation Systems. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2009). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [185] Cahill J., et al. HILAS Flight Operations Research Development of Risk/Safety Management, Process Improvement and Task Support Tools. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [186] Coelho D.A., Cognitive Engineering and Emergency Management. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition. (2013). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [187] Hollnagel E., Cognitive ergonomics it's all in the mind. Ergonomics, 40(10) (1997) 1170-1182.
• [188] Larsson P., Tingvall C., The Safe System Approach – A Road Safety Strategy Based on Human Factors Principles. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Applications and Services. (2013). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [189] Champagne, M.A., Effect of Automation Level on Cognitive Workload when Collaborating with a Robotic Assistant. (2022).
• [190] Gamboa P, et al., Attention Classification Based on Biosignals during Standard Cognitive Tasks for Occupational Domains. Computers, 11(4) (2022) 49.
• [191] Johnsen S.O., Kilskar S.S., Fossum K.R., Missing focus on Human Factors – organizational and cognitive ergonomics – in the safety management for the petroleum industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability, 231(4) (2017) 400-410.
• [192] Lee J.D., Emerging challenges in cognitive ergonomics Managing swarms of self-organizing agent-based automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(3) (2001) 238-250.
• [193] Pinheiro S., et al., Ergonomics and Safety in the Design of Industrial Collaborative Robotics, in Occupational and Environmental Safety and Health III, M. Arezes, et al., Editors. (2022), Springer International Publishing Cham. 465-478.
• [194] Akkari A.C.S., da Rocha M.F.M., R.F. de Farias Novaes. Cognitive Ergonomics and the Industry 4.0. in Proceedings of the 3rd Brazilian Technology Symposium. (2019). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [195] Barber P and Laws J., Editorial Cognitive ergonomics empowering designers and users? Ergonomics, 37(11) (1994) 1749-1752.
• [196] Chamberland C., et al., A Cognitive and Affective Neuroergonomics Approach to Game Design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1) (2015) 1075-1079.
• [197] Chevalier A., Kicka M., Web designers and web users Influence of the ergonomic quality of the web site on the information search. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(10) (2006). 1031-1048.
• [198] Chignell M.H., et al., Can Cognitive Assessment Games Save Us from Cognitive Decline? Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 10(1) (2021) 7-12.
• [199] Ciccone B.A., Bailey S.K.T., Lewis J.E., The Next Generation of Virtual Reality Recommendations for Accessible and Ergonomic Design. Ergonomics in Design, (2021) 10648046211002578.
• [200] D’Addona D.M., et al., Adaptive automation and human factors in manufacturing an experimental assessment for a cognitive approach. CIRP Annals, 67(1) (2018) 455-458.
• [201] Grajewski D., et al., Application of Virtual Reality Techniques in Design of Ergonomic Manufacturing Workplaces. Procedia Computer Science, 25 (2013) 289-301.
• [202] Hacker W., Improving engineering design- contributions of cognitive ergonomics. Ergonomics, 40(10) (1997)1088-1096.
• [203] Hu B., et al., Predicting real-world ergonomic measurements by simulation in a virtual environment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(1) (2011) 64-71.
• [204] Jeong S., Jung E.S., and Im Y., Ergonomic evaluation of interaction techniques and 3D menus for the practical design of 3D stereoscopic displays. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 53 (2016) 205-218.
• [205] Kadefors R., Forsman M., Ergonomic evaluation of complex work a participative approach employing video–computer interaction, exemplified in a study of order picking. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25(4) (2000) 435-445.
• [206] Kolski C., Formalization Approaches of Ergonomic Knowledge for “Intelligent” Design, Evaluation and Management of Man-Machine Interface in Process Control. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 25(6) (1992) 175-180.
• [207] O’B Holt, et al., Immersive Virtual Reality In Cable and Pipe Routing Design Metaphors and Cognitive Ergonomics. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(3) (2004) 161-170.
• [208] Sun G., Yao S., Carretero J.A., Comparing Cognitive Efficiency of Experienced and Inexperienced Designers in Conceptual Design Processes. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(4) (2014) 330-351.
• [209] Tong T., et al., Improving the Ergonomics of Cognitive Assessment with Serious Games. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 4(1) (2015) 1-5.
• [210] Almeida, V.M., S. Rafael, and M. Neves. Natural Human-Computer Interfaces’ Paradigm and Cognitive Ergonomics. in Advances in Ergonomics in Design. (2020). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [211] Coomans S. Lacerda G.S., PETESE, a Pedagogical Ergonomic Tool for Educational Software Evaluation. Procedia Manufacturing, 3 (2015) 5881-5888.
• [212] Czerniak J.N., et al., The Index of Cognitive Activity - Eligibility for task-evoked informational strain and robustness towards visual influences. Applied Ergonomics, 92 (2021) 103342.
• [213] Deng L., G. Wang, and S. Yu, Layout design of human-machine interaction interface of cabin based on cognitive ergonomics and GA-ACA. Intell. Neuroscience, (2016) 2.
• [214] Dimitrokalli A., et al., On the assessment of human-robot collaboration in mechanical product assembly by use of Virtual Reality. Procedia Manufacturing, 51(2020) 627-634.
• [215] Falzon P., Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding, Learning, and Designing Human-Computer Interaction, ed. B. Gaines and A. Monk. 1990, London Academic Press.
• [216] Franks M. Briggs P., Use of a cognitive ergonomics approach to compare usability of a multidose dry powder inhaler and a capsule dry powder inhaler an open-label, randomized, controlled study. Clinical Therapeutics, 26(11) (2004) 1791-1799.
• [217] Gao Y., et al. Operational Decision Making in Aluminium Smelters. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2009). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [218] Huang T.-L., Liao S., A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2) (2015) 269-295.
• [219] Johnson C.W., Impact of working environments upon human-machine dialogues a formal logic for the integrated specification of physical and cognitive ergonomic constraints on user interface design. Ergonomics, 39(3) (1996) 512-530.
• [220] Kalakoski V., et al., Cognitive ergonomics for data analysis. Experimental study of cognitive limitations in a data-based judgement task. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(10) (2019) 1038-1047.
• [221] Kolski C., Millot P., A rule-based approach to the ergonomic “static” evaluation of man-machine graphic interface in industrial processes. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35(5) (1991) 657-674.
• [222] Kosti M.V., et al., Towards an affordable brain computer interface for the assessment of programmers’ mental workload. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 115 (2018). 52-66.
• [223] Laws J.V. Barber J., Video analysis in cognitive ergonomics a methodological perspective. Ergonomics, (1989) 32(11) 1303-1318.
• [224] Mahfoudhi A., Abed M., Angué J.C., TOOD Task object-oriented description for ergonomic interfaces specification, in Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man–Machine Systems (1995), T.B. Sheridan, Editor. 1995, Pergamon Oxford. 641-646.
• [225] Mlilo, S. Thatcher A., Mental Models Have Users’ Mental Models of Web Search Engines Improved in the Last Ten Years? in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2011). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [226] Patrick J., et al. Designing the Interface to Encourage More Cognitive Processing. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [227] Qian C., et al., Affective Recognition Using EEG Signal in Human-Robot Interaction. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2018). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [228] Rodrigues M., et al., Cognitive-ergonomics and instructional aspects of e-learning courses. Work, 41 (2012) 5684-5685.
• [229] Savioja P., et al. Defining a Work Support and Training Tool for Automation Design Engineers. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2007). Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [230] Singh A., et al., A comparative evaluation of the wearable augmented reality-based data presentation interface and traditional methods for data entry tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 86 (2021) 103190.
• [231] Taylor, G., Natural, Multi-modal Interfaces for Unmanned Systems. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics Cognition and Design. (2017). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [232] Wu C. Liu Y., Development and evaluation of an ergonomic software package for predicting multiple-task human performance and mental workload in human–machine interface design and evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(1) (2009) 323-333.
• [233] Anderson, J.R., et al., An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol Rev, 111(4) (2004) 1036-60.
• [234] Brunzini, A., et al., Virtual training for assembly tasks a framework for the analysis of the cognitive impact on operators. Procedia Manufacturing, 55 (2021) 527-534.
• [235] Chen M., Fadel G., Mata I., Applications of affordance and cognitive ergonomics in virtual design A digital camera as an illustrative case. Concurrent Engineering, 30(1) (2022) 5-20.
• [236] Conradi J., Alexander T., Analysis of Visual Performance during the Use of Mobile Devices While Walking. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [237] Jo D., Lee S., Lee Y., The Effect of Driving Speed on Driver’s Visual Attention Experimental Investigation. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [238] Métayer N., Coeugnet S., Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle an ergonomic comparison of external HMI. Applied Ergonomics, 96 (2021) 103478.
• [239] Rodriguez Aguiñaga A., et al., Cognitive Ergonomics Evaluation Assisted by an Intelligent Emotion Recognition Technique. Applied Sciences, 10(5) (2020). 1736.
• [240] Scheer M., et al. The Influence of Visualization on Control Performance in a Flight Simulator. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2014). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [241] Tian Y., et al., What affects gait performance during walking while texting? A comparison of motor, visual and cognitive factors. Ergonomics, 61(11) (2018) 1507-1518.
• [242] White, A.R., Human expertise in the interpretation of remote sensing data A cognitive task analysis of forest disturbance attribution. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 74 (2019) 37-44.
• [243] Wang L. Ren Y., A Complex Perspective of System Situation Awareness. in Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. (2016). Cham Springer International Publishing.
• [244] Bababeipouya A., Using CREAM techniques for investigating human error with cognitive ergonomics approach in the control room of cement industry. IJBPAS4, (2015) 1480-1484.
• [245] Pfeffer S., et al., Cognitive Ergonomics and Informatory Load in Anesthesia. Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, 57 (2012) 947-950.
• [246] Jiancaro T., Jamieson G.A., Mihailidis A., Twenty Years of Cognitive Work Analysis in Health Care A Scoping Review. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1) (2013) 3-22.
• [247] Read G.J.M., et al., Using cognitive work analysis to identify competencies for human factors and ergonomics practitioners. Ergonomics, (2021) 1-14.
• [248] Hoc J.M., Cognitive ergonomics a multidisciplinary venture. Ergonomics, 51(1) (2008) 71-75.
• [249] Ariansyah D., et al., A head mounted augmented reality design practice for maintenance assembly Toward meeting perceptual and cognitive needs of AR users. Applied Ergonomics, 98(2022). 103597.
• [250] Paes D., Irizarry J., Pujoni D., Evidence of cognitive benefits from immersive design review Comparing three-dimensional perception and presence between immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. Automation in Construction, 130(2021) 103849.
• [251] Johansen, T.K., Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. 1997 Cambridge University Press
• [252] Jarrett C., Great Myths of the Brain. (2014) Wiley-Blackwell.
• [253] Moller A.R., Sensory Systems Anatomy, Physiology and Pathophysiology. (2003) London Elsevier.
• [254] Adem A., Çakıt E., Dağdeviren M., A Literature Search on Neuroergonomics Studies. Ergonomi (Online), 2(2) (2019) 131-136.