Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi

Year 2019, , 526 - 532, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.467978

Abstract

Değişiklik (varyasyon), yaşam süresinin
ve ritmik biyolojik döngülerin bir sonucu olabilmesine rağmen, birçok analitin
biyolojik çeşitliliği, en basit modelde, homeostatik bir ayar noktasının
etrafındaki rastgele dalgalanma olarak tanımlanabilir. Biyolojik varyasyon
birey içi ve bireyler arası bileşenlerinin büyüklüğünü tanımlamak için çok
sayıda koşulu basit deneysel yöntem ile açıklamaktadır. Bu deneysel teknik
kullanılarak üretilen ortalama birey içi ve bireyler arası biyolojik değerler
ile ilişkili olarak RCV(referans değişim değer) ve II(bireysellik indeksi)
hakkında bilgi ve yorum yapılabilmektedir. Ayrıca, geleneksel popülasyona
dayalı referans değerlerin kullanımı ve uygunluğu, test sonuçlarını bildirmenin
en iyi yolunu, numune toplamanın en uygun şeklini ve en büyük potansiyel
kullanımı olan test prosedürünü belirlemeyi, epidemiyolojide kullanılan
güvenilirlik katsayısının hesaplanmasını, herhangi bir yeni test prosedürünün
geliştirilmesini, belirtilen bir olasılık ile belirli bir yüzde içindeki
homeostatik ayar noktasını tahmin etmek için gereken örnek sayısının
belirlenmesi için kullanılabilmektedir. Bu ve buna benzer kullanım
kolaylıklarının sağlanmasında yer almasından dolayı, bu derlemede biyolojik
varyasyon, referans değişim değeri ve
bireysellik indeksi hakkında bilgi sunmayı amaçladık.




References

  • 1. Fraser CG. Biological variation: from principles to practice: Amer. Assoc. for Clinical Chemistry; 2001.
  • 2. Peterson JC, Hill RH, Black RS, Winkelman J, Tholen D. Review of proficiency testing services for clinical laboratories in the United States–final report of a Technical Working Group. Division of Laboratory Systems, CDC, April. 2008.
  • 3. Menditto A, Patriarca M, Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accreditation and quality assurance. 2007; 12: 45-47.
  • 4. Taga Y, Aslan D, Güner G, Kutay FZ. Tıbbi laboratuarlarda standardizasyon ve kalite yönetimi. Ankara, Türk Biyokimya Derneği Yayınları 2000; 106-23.
  • 5. Fraser CG. Inherent biological variation and reference values. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 2004; 42: 758-64.
  • 6. Yılmaz FM, Kıral S. An underestimated preanalytical error source: Centrifuge temperature. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry 2013; 38.
  • 7. Braga F, Panteghini M. Generation of data on within-subject biological variation in laboratory medicine: an update. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences 2016; 53: 313-25.
  • 8. Simundic A-M, Kackov S, Miler M, Fraser CG, Petersen PH. Terms and symbols used in studies on biological variation: the need for harmonization. Clinical chemistry 2015; 61: 438-39.
  • 9. Ricos C, Jiménez CV, Hernández A, Simón M, Perich C, Alvarez V et al. Biological variation in urine samples used for analyte measurements. Clinical chemistry 1994; 40: 472-77.
  • 10. Fraser CG, Cummings ST, Wilkinson SP, Neville RG, Knox J, Ho O et al. Biological variability of 26 clinical chemistry analytes in elderly people. Clinical chemistry. 1989; 35: 783-86.
  • 11. Lacher D, Hughes J, Carroll MD. National health statistics reports. National Center for Health Statistic 2010; 21: 1999-2002.
  • 12. Ricós C, Iglesias N, García-Lario J-V, Simón M, Cava F, Hernández A et al. Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences. Annals of clinical biochemistry 2007; 44: 343-52.
  • 13. Biosca C, Ricós C, Lauzurica R, Galimany R, Petersen PH. Reference change value concept combining two delta values to predict crises in renal posttransplantation. Clinical chemistry 2001; 47: 2146-48.
  • 14. Sölétormos G, Semjonow A, Sibley PE, Lamerz R, Petersen PH, Albrecht W et al. Biological variation of total prostate-specific antigen: a survey of published estimates and consequences for clinical practice. Clinical Chemistry 2005; 51: 1342-51.
  • 15. Fraser C. Biological variation in clinical chemistry. An update: collated data, 1988-1991. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 1992; 116: 916-23.
  • 16. Sebastian-Gambaro MA, Liron-Hernandez FJ, Fuentes-Arderiu X. Intra-and inter-individual biological variability data bank. European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry 1997; 35: 845-52.
  • 17. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario J, Hernandez A, Jimenez C et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. 1999; 59: 491-500.
  • 18. Minchinela J, Ricós C, Perich C, Fernández-Calle P, Alvarez V, Domenech M et al. Biological variation database, and quality specifications for imprecision, bias and total error (desirable and minimum). The 2014 update. 2012.
  • 19. Petersen PH, Rustad P. Prerequisites for establishing common reference intervals. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation 2004; 64: 285-92.
  • 20. Ricos C, Cava F, García‐Lario J, Hernandez A, Iglesias N, Jimenez C et al. The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation 2004; 64: 175-84.

Biological variation in clinical biochemistry: Reference change value and ındividual ındex

Year 2019, , 526 - 532, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.467978

Abstract

Although variation may be the
result of life cycle and rhythmic biological cycles, the biodiversity of many
analytes can be described as the simplest model, a random fluctuation around a
homeostatic setpoint. Biological variation describes a number of conditions
with simple experimental methods to define the magnitude of the intra- and
inter-individual components. Information and comments can be made about RCV
(reference change value) and II (individuality index) in relation to the mean
intra- and inter-individual biological values generated using this experimental
technique. Furthermore, the use and suitability of conventional,
population-based reference values, the best way to report test results,
determining the test method that is the most appropriate form and the greatest
potential use of the sample collection, calculating the reliability coefficient
used in the epidemiology, the development of any new test procedure, it can be
used to determine the number of samples required to estimate the homeostatic
setpoint in a given percentage. In this review, we aimed to present information
about biological variation, reference change value and individuality index.

References

  • 1. Fraser CG. Biological variation: from principles to practice: Amer. Assoc. for Clinical Chemistry; 2001.
  • 2. Peterson JC, Hill RH, Black RS, Winkelman J, Tholen D. Review of proficiency testing services for clinical laboratories in the United States–final report of a Technical Working Group. Division of Laboratory Systems, CDC, April. 2008.
  • 3. Menditto A, Patriarca M, Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accreditation and quality assurance. 2007; 12: 45-47.
  • 4. Taga Y, Aslan D, Güner G, Kutay FZ. Tıbbi laboratuarlarda standardizasyon ve kalite yönetimi. Ankara, Türk Biyokimya Derneği Yayınları 2000; 106-23.
  • 5. Fraser CG. Inherent biological variation and reference values. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 2004; 42: 758-64.
  • 6. Yılmaz FM, Kıral S. An underestimated preanalytical error source: Centrifuge temperature. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry 2013; 38.
  • 7. Braga F, Panteghini M. Generation of data on within-subject biological variation in laboratory medicine: an update. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences 2016; 53: 313-25.
  • 8. Simundic A-M, Kackov S, Miler M, Fraser CG, Petersen PH. Terms and symbols used in studies on biological variation: the need for harmonization. Clinical chemistry 2015; 61: 438-39.
  • 9. Ricos C, Jiménez CV, Hernández A, Simón M, Perich C, Alvarez V et al. Biological variation in urine samples used for analyte measurements. Clinical chemistry 1994; 40: 472-77.
  • 10. Fraser CG, Cummings ST, Wilkinson SP, Neville RG, Knox J, Ho O et al. Biological variability of 26 clinical chemistry analytes in elderly people. Clinical chemistry. 1989; 35: 783-86.
  • 11. Lacher D, Hughes J, Carroll MD. National health statistics reports. National Center for Health Statistic 2010; 21: 1999-2002.
  • 12. Ricós C, Iglesias N, García-Lario J-V, Simón M, Cava F, Hernández A et al. Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences. Annals of clinical biochemistry 2007; 44: 343-52.
  • 13. Biosca C, Ricós C, Lauzurica R, Galimany R, Petersen PH. Reference change value concept combining two delta values to predict crises in renal posttransplantation. Clinical chemistry 2001; 47: 2146-48.
  • 14. Sölétormos G, Semjonow A, Sibley PE, Lamerz R, Petersen PH, Albrecht W et al. Biological variation of total prostate-specific antigen: a survey of published estimates and consequences for clinical practice. Clinical Chemistry 2005; 51: 1342-51.
  • 15. Fraser C. Biological variation in clinical chemistry. An update: collated data, 1988-1991. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 1992; 116: 916-23.
  • 16. Sebastian-Gambaro MA, Liron-Hernandez FJ, Fuentes-Arderiu X. Intra-and inter-individual biological variability data bank. European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry 1997; 35: 845-52.
  • 17. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario J, Hernandez A, Jimenez C et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. 1999; 59: 491-500.
  • 18. Minchinela J, Ricós C, Perich C, Fernández-Calle P, Alvarez V, Domenech M et al. Biological variation database, and quality specifications for imprecision, bias and total error (desirable and minimum). The 2014 update. 2012.
  • 19. Petersen PH, Rustad P. Prerequisites for establishing common reference intervals. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation 2004; 64: 285-92.
  • 20. Ricos C, Cava F, García‐Lario J, Hernandez A, Iglesias N, Jimenez C et al. The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation 2004; 64: 175-84.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Revıew Artıcle
Authors

Erdem Çokluk

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Çokluk, E. (2019). Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, 10(4), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.467978
AMA Çokluk E. Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi. TJCL. December 2019;10(4):526-532. doi:10.18663/tjcl.467978
Chicago Çokluk, Erdem. “Klinik Biyokimyada Biyolojik Varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri Ve Bireysellik Indeksi”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 10, no. 4 (December 2019): 526-32. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.467978.
EndNote Çokluk E (December 1, 2019) Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 10 4 526–532.
IEEE E. Çokluk, “Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi”, TJCL, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 526–532, 2019, doi: 10.18663/tjcl.467978.
ISNAD Çokluk, Erdem. “Klinik Biyokimyada Biyolojik Varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri Ve Bireysellik Indeksi”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 10/4 (December 2019), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.467978.
JAMA Çokluk E. Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi. TJCL. 2019;10:526–532.
MLA Çokluk, Erdem. “Klinik Biyokimyada Biyolojik Varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri Ve Bireysellik Indeksi”. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, vol. 10, no. 4, 2019, pp. 526-32, doi:10.18663/tjcl.467978.
Vancouver Çokluk E. Klinik biyokimyada biyolojik varyasyon: Referansdeğişim değeri ve bireysellik indeksi. TJCL. 2019;10(4):526-32.


e-ISSN: 2149-8296

The content of this site is intended for health care professionals. All the published articles are distributed under the terms of

Creative Commons Attribution Licence,

which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.