Gençlerde Dikkatli Karar Verme, Duygusal Zeka ve Sosyo-Demografik Değişkenler Arası İlişkiler

Year 2023, Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 1 - 12, 28.12.2023

Arkun Tatar Didem Ayhan

https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1085380

Abstract

Bu çalışmada gençlerde dikkatli karar vermede duygusal zekanın ve duyguları dikkate alan düşünme biçiminin etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca sosyo-demografik değişkenlerin dikkatli karar vermede üzerindeki etkileri de test edilmiştir. Çalışmaya 18-29 yaşları arasında 556 genç katılmıştır. Dikkatli karar verme Melbourne Karar Verme Ölçeği’nin Dikkatli Karar Verme Stili alt boyutu ile duyguları dikkate alan düşünme biçimi ise gözden geçirilmiş Schutte Duygusal Zeka Ölçeği alt boyutları ile değerlendirilmiştir. Dikkatli Karar Verme Stili alt boyut kullanılarak dikkatli karar verme düzeyi düşük ve yüksek olan iki grup oluşturulmuştur. Daha sonra bu iki grubu ayırt edip etmediğini incelemek amacıyla çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre kurulan çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizi modeli toplam varyansın % 4,0'ını açıklamaktadır ve grupları sınıflandırmadaki genel isabet oranını da % 57,0’dır. İyimserlik / Ruh Halinin Düzenlenmesi alt boyutu ve yaş değişken ise dikkatli karar verme düzeyi düşük ve yüksek gruplarından birinde yer almanın yordayıcıları olarak belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Dikkatli Karar Verme, Duygusal Zeka, İyimserlik, Ruh Halinin Düzenlenmesi

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

Yok

Relationship between Vigilant Decision-Making, Emotional Intelligence and Socio-Demographic Variables in the Young

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of emotional intelligence and the way of thinking that considers emotions in vigilant decision-making in the young. The effects of socio-demographic variables on vigilant decision-making were also tested in the study. A total of 556 young people, between the ages of 18-29 participated in the study. Vigilant decision-making was evaluated with the Vigilance Decision-Making Styles sub-dimension of the Melbourne DecisionMaking Questionnaire, and the thinking style that considers emotions was evaluated with the revised Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale subdimensions. By using the Vigilance Decision-Making Styles sub-dimension, two groups with a low and a high level of vigilant decision-making were formed. Then, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine whether it distinguished these two groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis model established according to the results explains 4.0% of the total variance and the overall accuracy in classifying the groups is 57.0%. The Optimism / Mood Regulation sub-dimension and the age variable were determined as predictors of being into one of the low and high levels of vigilant decision-making.

Keywords

Vigilant Decision-Making, Emotional Intelligence, Optimism, Mood Regulation

Project Number

Yok

References

• Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013). The teenage brain: peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 114-120. DOI: 10.1177/0963721412471347
• Almy, B., Kuskowski, M., Malone, S. M., Myers, E., & Luciana, M. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of adolescent decision-making with the Iowa Gambling Task. Developmental Psychology, 54(4), 689-702. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000460
• Austin, E. J., Saklofske, D. H., Huang, S. H., & McKenney, D. (2004). Measurement of trait emotional intelligence: testing and cross-validating a modified version of Schutte et al.'s (1998) measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 555-562. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00114-4
• Blakemore, S. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2012). Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nature Neuroscience, 15(9), 1184-1191. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3177
• Burnett, S., Bault, N., Coricelli, G., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Adolescents’ heightened risk-seeking in a probabilistic gambling task. Cognitive Development, 25(2), 183-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.003
• Byrnes, J. P. (2002). The development of decision-making. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 208-215. DOI: 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00503-7
• Byrnes, J. P. (2005). The development of self-regulated decision making. In J. E. Jacobs & P. A. Klaczynski, (Eds.), The development of judgment and decision making in children and adolescent (pp. 5-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cauffman, E., & Woolard, J. (2005). Crime, Competence, and Culpability: Adolescent Judgment in the Justice System. In J. E. Jacobs & P. A. Klaczynski (Eds.), The development of judgment and decision making in children and adolescent (pp. 5-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Chapman, H. R., Chipchase, S. Y., & Bretherton, R. (2017). The evaluation of a continuing professional development package for primary care dentists designed to reduce stress, build resilience and improve clinical decision-making. British Dental Journal, 223(4), 261-271. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.712
• Deniz, M. E. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin karar vermede öz saygı karar verme stilleri ve problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(15), 23-35.
• Deniz, M., & Avşaroğlu, S. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin duygusal zekâ yeteneklerinin karar vermede özsaygı ve karar verme stillerini açıklama. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 121-138.
• Di Fabio, A. (2012). Emotional intelligence: A new variable in career decision-making. In A. Di Fabio, (Ed.), Emotional intelligence: New perspectives and applications (pp. 51-66). Rijeka, Croatia: Intechopen.
• Di Fabio, A., & Blustein, D. L. (2010). Emotional intelligence and decisional conflict styles: Some empirical evidence among Italian high school students. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(1), 71-81. DOI: 10.1177/1069072709350904
• Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709-730. DOI: 10.1037/a0014983
• Fischhoff, B. (2008). Assessing adolescent decision-making competence. Developmental Review, 28(1), 12-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.001
• Galvan, A., & Rahdar, A. (2013). The neurobiological effects of stress on adolescent decision making. Neuroscience, 249, 223-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.074
• Hartley, C. A., & Somerville, L. H. (2015). The neuroscience of adolescent decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 108-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.004
• Klaczynski, P. A. (2001). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision-making. Child Development, 72, 844-861. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00319
• Kurtoğlu, M. (2018). Determination of the relationship between emotional intelligence level and decision making strategies in gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.17478/JEGYS.2018.70
• Mann, L., Burnett, P., Radford, M., & Ford, S. (1997). The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<1::AID-BDM242>3.0.CO;2-X
• Mann, L., Harmoni, R., & Power, C. (1989). Adolescent decision-making: The development of competence. Journal of Adolescence, 12(3), 265-278. DOI: 10.1016/0140-1971(89)90077-8
• Paulsen, D., Platt, M., Huettel, S. A., & Brannon, E. M. (2011). Decision-making under risk in children, adolescents, and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 72. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00072
• Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(1), 1-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x
• Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167-177. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4
• Smith, A. R., Steinberg, L., & Chein, J. (2014). The role of the anterior insula in adolescent decision making. Developmental Neuroscience, 36(3-4), 196-209. DOI: 10.1159/000358918
• Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20(3), 249-272. DOI: 10.1007/BF01499023
• Tatar, A., Tok, S., & Saltukoğlu, G. (2011). Gözden geçirilmiş Schutte Duygusal Zekâ Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 21(4), 325-338. DOI: 10.5455/bcp.20110624015920
• Tatar, A. (2021). Gelişim psikolojisinde araştırma yöntemleri. İç. D. M. Siyez (Ed.), Çocuk ve ergen gelişimi: çok boyutlu bir bakış (1. bas. s. 38-85). Pegem Akademi. DOI: 10.14527/9786257676090
• van Hoorn, J., Shablack, H., Lindquist, K. A., & Telzer, E. H. (2019). Incorporating the social context into neurocognitive models of adolescent decision-making: a neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 129-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.024
• van Leijenhorst, L., Moor, B. G., de Macks, Z. A. O., Rombouts, S. A., Westenberg, P. M., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Adolescent risky decision-making: neurocognitive development of reward and control regions. Neuroimage, 51(1), 345-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.038
• Wray, L. D., & Stone, E. R. (2005). The role of self‐esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(2), 125-144. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.490