Scientific Approach with Problem Posing Integrated in Introductory Microeconomics Theory, whether Work?

Year 2018, , 1 - 10, 01.10.2018

Albrian Fiky Prakoso Dhiah Fıtrayatı Retno Mustika Dewı

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.415828

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study aims to improve student learning outcomes in the introductory microeconomics theory subject. This research is included in classroom action research with three cycles. The model is use a scientific approach integrated with problem posing and was conducted on business education student Class A Universitas Negeri Surabaya. This learning model required the students to create a problem. When the students create a problem, they also think about the answer. This stage will make the students thinking twice . The students understanding will increase and have positive impact on improving student learning outcomes by those activity. This paper provides a new view to collaborate between a scientific approach integrated with problem posing to improve student learning outcomes.

Keywords

Scientific Approach, Problem Posing, Microeconomics

References

• Bahçuvanoğlu, F. F. (2018). Evaluation of teachers views concerning ideality levels. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(1), 21–27. Bradshaw, Z., & Hazell, A. (2017). Developing problem-solving skills in mathematics: a lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2016-0032 Bungai, J. (2006). Pengaruh Kompetensi Kepala Sekolah, Iklim Sekolah, dan Keefektifan Mengajar terhadap Prestasi Lulusan SMA. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(2), 91–99. Culture, M. of E. and. Module Implementation Training Curriculum Guidelines 2013 (2013). Indonesia: Human Resources Development Agency of Education and Culture and Education Quality Assurance. Fauziah, R., Abdullah, A. G., & Hakim, D. L. (2013). Pembelajaran Saintifik Elektronika Dasar Berorientasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Invotec, 9(2), 165–178. Haji, S. (2011). Pendekatan Problem Posing dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan Triadik, 14(1), 55–63. Herawati, oktiana dwi putra, Siroj, R., & Basir, dan H. . D. (2010). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Posing terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 6 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 70–80. Hidayati, N., & Endryansyah. (2014). Pengaruh Penggunaan Pendekatan Ilmiah (Scientific Approach) dalam Pembelajaran terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XII TITL 1 SMK Negeri 7 Surabaya pada Standar Kompetensi Mengoperasikan Sistem Kendali Elektromagnetik. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(2), 25–29. Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as the scientific method: Three Decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135. Holmqvist, M. (2017). Models for collaborative professional development for teachers in Mathematics. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), IJLLS-12-2016-0051. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2016-0051 Japa, I. G. N. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kuantum Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran Matematika terhadap Penalaran Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(1), 9–16. Johnson, E. B. (2006). Contextual Teaching Learning. Bandung: MLC. Lamba, H. A. (2006). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model STAD dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(2), 100–107. Lee, Y. C., Lau, K., & Yip, V. W. Y. (2016). Blended learning for building student-teachers’ capacity to learn and teach science-related interdisciplinary subjects. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2016-0029 Masitoh, S. (2006). Peningkatan Aktivitas Belajar dengan Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok dalam Kuliah Metode Penelitian PLB II. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(2), 100–107. Oladele, B. (2017). Analysis of 2014 Post UTME Score of Candidates in the University of Ibadan with Two Methods of Standard Setting to Set Cut Off Points. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(2), 44–51. Riduwan. (2009). Learning Easy Research for Teachers, Employees and Researcher Starter. Bandung: Alfabeta. Ristanto, R. H., Zubaidah, S., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2018). The Potential of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition in Biology Learning at Higher Education. Int Ernational Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(1), 50–56. Rudolph, J. (2005). Epistemology for the masses: The origins of the scientific method in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45, 341–376. Rustini, Y. (2013). Pemahaman Konsep Pendapatan Nasional melalui Pembelajaran Langsung dengan Pendekatan Problem Posing di SMA Negeri 1 Tarakan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 6(1), 12–26. Salemi, M. K. (2005). Teaching Economic Literacy: Why, What, and How. International Review of Economic Edcation, 4(2), 46–57. Skott, C. K., & Møller, H. (2017). The individual teacher in lesson study collaboration. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), IJLLS-10-2016-0041. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2016-0041 Thobroni, M., & Mustofa, A. (2012). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: AR-Ruzz Media. Varelas, M., & Ford, M. (2008). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: tensions in teaching and learning. USA: Wiley InterScience. Wood, K. (2017). Teacher learning through collaboration. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), IJLLS 05-2017-0025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2017-0025