Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services

Year 2021, , 989 - 995, 01.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.777837

Abstract

Telecom operators experience difficulties in applications such as virtual local area network (VLAN) management, bandwidth management and access management while providing intranet services in traditional networks. In this study, open network operating system (ONOS) based software defined network (SDN) platform is developed for intranet services in order to address these problems. The developed platform has been integrated onto an existing network and a new topology has been created. In this proposed topology, intranet network elements are connected to the new generation SDN switches instead of the legacy switches. The proposed solution has been tested on a live network. According to test results where the proposed SDN platform is compared with the traditional intranet network in a live network scenario under varying traffic load, the SDN based platform achieved very successful results in terms of latency, jitter, packet loss and flow setup times. Overall, the proposed SDN platform provides a good alternative to traditional solutions in large scale intranet networks, minimizing the workload spent by the operators in controlling the network, while achieving cost savings and eliminating vendor dependency.

References

  • [1] McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G., Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J., “OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2): 69-77, (2008).
  • [2] Bondkovskii A., Keeney J., van der Meer S., Weber S., “Qualitative comparison of open-source sdn controllers”, IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, 889-894, (2016).
  • [3] Koponen T., Casado M., Gude N., Stribling J., Poutievski L., Zhu M., Ramanathan R., Iwata Y., Inoue H., Hama T., Shenker S., “Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks”, 9th Usenix Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 351-364, (2010).
  • [4] Internet: Linux Foundation, The OpenDaylight Platform, https://www.opendaylight.org, 06.06.2020.
  • [5] Internet: Open Network Operating System (ONOS), https://wiki.onosproject.org/display/ONOS/Wiki+Home, 20.05.2020.
  • [6] Internet: https://sdxcentral.com/networking/sdn/ definitions/what-is-floodlight-controller/, 15.07.2020.
  • [7] Internet: http://www.opencontrail.org/a-blueprint-for-building-the-opencontrail-community/, 18.07.2020.
  • [8] Abdullah T., “Testing of floodlight controller with mininet in SDN topology”, ScienceRise, 5 (2): 68-73, (2014).
  • [9] Yamei F., Qing L., Qi H., “Research and comparative analysis of performance test on SDN controller”, 2016 First IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication and the Internet (ICCCI), 207-210, (2016).
  • [10] Suh D., Jang S., Han S., Pack S., Kim M. S., Kim T., Lim C. G., “Toward highly available and scalable software defined networks for service providers”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(4):100-107, (2017).
  • [11] Mamushiane L., Lysko A., Dlamini S., “A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers”, 2018 Wireless Days (WD), 54-59, (2018).
  • [12] Salman O., Elhajj I. H., Kayssi A., Chehab A., “SDN controllers: A comparative study”, Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 1-6, (2016).
  • [13] Shah S. A., Faiz J., Farooq M., Shafi A., Mehdi S. A., “An architectural evaluation of SDN controllers”, IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (2013).
  • [14] Leenheer M. De, Tofigh T., Parulkar G., “Open and programmable metro networks”, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Th1A.7, (2016).
  • [15] Kumari A., Chandra J., Sairam A. S., “Optimizing flow setup time in software defined network”, 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), 543-545, (2018).

SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services

Year 2021, , 989 - 995, 01.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.777837

Abstract

Telecom operators experience difficulties in applications such as virtual local area network (VLAN) management, bandwidth management and access management while providing intranet services in traditional networks. In this study, open network operating system (ONOS) based software defined network (SDN) platform is developed for intranet services in order to address these problems. The developed platform has been integrated onto an existing network and a new topology has been created. In this proposed topology, intranet network elements are connected to the new generation SDN switches instead of the legacy switches. The proposed solution has been tested on a live network. According to test results where the proposed SDN platform is compared with the traditional intranet network in a live network scenario under varying traffic load, the SDN based platform achieved very successful results in terms of latency, jitter, packet loss and flow setup times. Overall, the proposed SDN platform provides a good alternative to traditional solutions in large scale intranet networks, minimizing the workload spent by the operators in controlling the network, while achieving cost savings and eliminating vendor dependency.

References

  • [1] McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G., Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J., “OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2): 69-77, (2008).
  • [2] Bondkovskii A., Keeney J., van der Meer S., Weber S., “Qualitative comparison of open-source sdn controllers”, IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, 889-894, (2016).
  • [3] Koponen T., Casado M., Gude N., Stribling J., Poutievski L., Zhu M., Ramanathan R., Iwata Y., Inoue H., Hama T., Shenker S., “Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks”, 9th Usenix Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 351-364, (2010).
  • [4] Internet: Linux Foundation, The OpenDaylight Platform, https://www.opendaylight.org, 06.06.2020.
  • [5] Internet: Open Network Operating System (ONOS), https://wiki.onosproject.org/display/ONOS/Wiki+Home, 20.05.2020.
  • [6] Internet: https://sdxcentral.com/networking/sdn/ definitions/what-is-floodlight-controller/, 15.07.2020.
  • [7] Internet: http://www.opencontrail.org/a-blueprint-for-building-the-opencontrail-community/, 18.07.2020.
  • [8] Abdullah T., “Testing of floodlight controller with mininet in SDN topology”, ScienceRise, 5 (2): 68-73, (2014).
  • [9] Yamei F., Qing L., Qi H., “Research and comparative analysis of performance test on SDN controller”, 2016 First IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication and the Internet (ICCCI), 207-210, (2016).
  • [10] Suh D., Jang S., Han S., Pack S., Kim M. S., Kim T., Lim C. G., “Toward highly available and scalable software defined networks for service providers”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(4):100-107, (2017).
  • [11] Mamushiane L., Lysko A., Dlamini S., “A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers”, 2018 Wireless Days (WD), 54-59, (2018).
  • [12] Salman O., Elhajj I. H., Kayssi A., Chehab A., “SDN controllers: A comparative study”, Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 1-6, (2016).
  • [13] Shah S. A., Faiz J., Farooq M., Shafi A., Mehdi S. A., “An architectural evaluation of SDN controllers”, IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (2013).
  • [14] Leenheer M. De, Tofigh T., Parulkar G., “Open and programmable metro networks”, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Th1A.7, (2016).
  • [15] Kumari A., Chandra J., Sairam A. S., “Optimizing flow setup time in software defined network”, 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), 543-545, (2018).
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mehmet Özdem 0000-0002-2901-2342

Mustafa Alkan 0000-0002-8503-9697

Publication Date September 1, 2021
Submission Date August 7, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Özdem, M., & Alkan, M. (2021). SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services. Politeknik Dergisi, 24(3), 989-995. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.777837
AMA Özdem M, Alkan M. SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services. Politeknik Dergisi. September 2021;24(3):989-995. doi:10.2339/politeknik.777837
Chicago Özdem, Mehmet, and Mustafa Alkan. “SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services”. Politeknik Dergisi 24, no. 3 (September 2021): 989-95. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.777837.
EndNote Özdem M, Alkan M (September 1, 2021) SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services. Politeknik Dergisi 24 3 989–995.
IEEE M. Özdem and M. Alkan, “SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services”, Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 989–995, 2021, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.777837.
ISNAD Özdem, Mehmet - Alkan, Mustafa. “SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services”. Politeknik Dergisi 24/3 (September 2021), 989-995. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.777837.
JAMA Özdem M, Alkan M. SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services. Politeknik Dergisi. 2021;24:989–995.
MLA Özdem, Mehmet and Mustafa Alkan. “SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services”. Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 3, 2021, pp. 989-95, doi:10.2339/politeknik.777837.
Vancouver Özdem M, Alkan M. SDN Based Management Platform for Intranet Services. Politeknik Dergisi. 2021;24(3):989-95.
 
TARANDIĞIMIZ DİZİNLER (ABSTRACTING / INDEXING)
181341319013191 13189 13187 13188 18016 

download Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası ile lisanslanmıştır.